Order Kate’s new book today and discover What Matters Next!

All Insights > Business & Strategy > True Insights vs “Actionable Takeaways”

True Insights vs “Actionable Takeaways"

It’s the seventh inning stretch of every keynote sales process: the event planner asks what kind of actionable takeaways the audience will have. Or sometimes they will ask for “actionable insights.”

We do in fact, at KO Insights, have a five-step process for generating more insights and foresights. I won’t break it down here, because that’s part of the magic I want people to experience in the keynote. But while I’m obviously a fan (I named my company after them), I find that insights are not actionable in and of themselves.

Insights often point the way to action, and to what is useful and needed. And they are often timeless, and can point the way again and again. That’s indeed part of our process.

That process can help you see insights that are as close to actions, as close to usable approaches as we can possibly make them.

But — stay with me here — I have two quibbles with the idea of actionable takeaways for leadership audiences in general.

One: Can we all agree that as high-functioning adults, we don’t respond very well to being told what our takeaways should be?

When I was a member of Entrepreneurs’ Organization — some of you may be members too — there was a rule that we couldn’t give each other advice. We could frame our feedback as “here’s what I did in a similar situation,” or we could ask what kind of input you might be looking for, or we could use a number of other techniques that would allow our input to be received as welcome, not intrusive, and not unsolicited. I have adopted that approach in my advisory work, and I carry it over into my keynote speaking as well.

And quibble number two: Since my audiences most often are senior executives and other top leaders, they are probably not going to walk away with a checklist or easy, tangible answers. When it comes to future-ready strategy, executives don’t usually get that luxury. As Gary Hamel and C.K. Prahalad wrote in their brilliant book Competing for the Future:

“Impatient, “results-oriented” senior executives must be willing to come back again and again to issues that are complex and seemingly indeterminable; they must be patient with open-ended discussions that yield no quick answers and produce no immediate decisions.”

Instead what I aim to offer are new ways of thinking. Greater clarity. Easier decision-making. A stronger sense of how to arrive at insights and foresights, and more comfort with what the future means for the organization.

If you’re more of a fan of Monty Python than business books (no judgement! I happen to like both), John Cleese also said it eloquently: deciding that you always need to be decisive is the surest way to strangle creativity. Some amount of sitting with a problem is necessary to find novel approaches to solve it.

Watch on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pb5oIIPO62g

Related Posts

Vibes All the Way Down: Dmitry Grozoubinski discusses tariffs and more on The Tech Humanist Show

Dmitry Grozoubinski has spent his career making trade legible to people who aren’t trade experts. When I asked him what people are experiencing as...

KO Insights slide: "The Trust Stack — Reality maintenance as a leadership discipline" with tags Leadership, Decision-Making, AI Governance

The Trust Stack: Reality Maintenance as a Leadership Discipline

Last week, a video clip went viral not because of what it showed, but because people couldn’t agree whether it was real. The arguments...

The Anthropic Test: Why Every Organization Needs to Define Its AI Non-Negotiables Now

The dispute between Anthropic and the Department of Defense isn’t primarily a story about one company and one contract. It’s a live-fire exercise in...

Five Insights from Thinksgiving 2025: Your Ethical Acceleration Toolkit

For more than 15 years, the week of American Thanksgiving has been my “Thinksgiving“—a deliberate pause to think deeply about what matters, review my...

UN AI "Red Lines" in Global Governance

UN Calls for AI Red Lines in Global Governance: Why Maria Angelita Ressa’s Warning Demands Immediate Action

During an already newsworthy second day of the United Nations General Assembly week, activist and author Maria Angelita Ressa took the stage to call...

The Strategic Implications of Anthropic’s Copyright Settlement: A Roadmap for Sustainable AI Development

Anthropic’s $1.5 billion copyright settlement just created the clearest roadmap yet for sustainable AI development. But most analysis is focused on the legal implications,...

Agentic AI: Beyond the Hype - What It Really Means for Businesses and Workers

Agentic AI: Beyond the Hype – What It Really Means for Businesses and Workers

The breathless tech hype machines are working overtime on agentic AI. CEOs and analysts alike herald it as the ultimate competitive advantage, a new...

The Economy is People header in A Future So Bright (photo by John DeMato)

Tariff Impact on Business Strategy: Why “The Economy Is People” Matters

I’ve said it for years: the economy is people. Not GDP figures. Not trade balances. Not abstract percentages that scroll across financial news tickers....

Meta’s Fact-Checking Retreat: When “Just a Tech Platform” Isn’t Good Enough

Meta’s decision to end political fact-checking strikes at the heart of Big Tech’s relationship with society. It’s a move that reveals how easily platforms...

The Art of Strategic Uncertainty

Here’s a counterintuitive truth about uncertainty: sometimes, knowing what you don’t know is more valuable than knowing what you do. As I explore in...

Defining Ethics in AI and Tech

Defining Ethics in AI and Tech

The topic of AI ethics is everywhere lately. We’ve covered it here before in a few ways. But let’s dive into a set of...

Nominated for a Thinkers50 award, the “Oscars of management ideas”

I couldn’t be more giddy about attending the Oscars — that is, the “Oscars of management ideas.” 🙂 The Thinkers50 Awards Gala is taking place...